Successful Transmitter Implantation Requires More Than Just a Safe Surgery: The Story of the Western Grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis)
IAAAM 2013
Joseph K. Gaydos1*; Mike Ziccardi2; Christine Fiorello2; Kyra Mills2; and Susan De La Cruz3
1The SeaDoc Society, UC Davis Wildlife Health Center - Orcas Island Office, Eastsound, Washington, 98245, USA; 2Wildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA; 3U.S. Geological Survey, 505 Azuar Drive, Vallejo, California, 94592, USA

Abstract

Western grebes (Aechmophorus occidentalis) are obligate aquatic birds that breed on freshwater inland lakes, constructing floating nests in emergent vegetation, and winter on marine waters. They are one of the marine bird species most often affected by oil spills in California and are believed to be in decline on the west coast of the United States. Early attempts to implant them with intracoelomic transmitters with percutaneous antennae using a standard surgical technique2 resulted in 100% mortality. A captive study using 21 birds and a slightly modified surgical procedure resulted in minimal detectable homeostatic disturbance in implanted birds, suggesting hope for increasing postoperative survival of implanted birds released into the wild.1 A subsequent study implanted and released 9 Western grebes using this modified technique.3 All but one bird survived at least 25 days arguing for an overall lack of surgery-related complications. The 44–56% mortality rate (or transmitter failure) within the first year after release, however, suggests that post-release complications such as impaired waterproofing, chronic low-grade infection, increased energy requirements due to transmitter weight, antenna drag or increased preening, increased predation, or, more likely, some degree of multifactorial interaction needs to be addressed before this procedure can be used with confidence. Although not well described or studied, an interactive effect likely exists between stress, thermoregulation, behavior, nutrition and immunity and this conspires against survival after capture, handling and transmitter implantation surgery. All of these factors should be addressed to maximize postoperative survival of implanted animals.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response and the Oiled Wildlife Care Network, Wildlife Health Center, UC Davis, with in-kind support from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the U.S. Geological Survey and the SeaDoc Society, a program of the UC Davis Wildlife Health Center. We thank the numerous biologists, veterinarians and veterinary technicians who assisted.

* Presenting author

Literature Cited

1.  Gaydos JK, Massey JG, Mulcahy DM, Gaskins L, Nysewander D, Evenson J, Siegel P, and Ziccardi M. 2011. Short-term survival and effects of transmitter implantation into Western Grebes using a modified surgical procedure. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 42:414–425.

2.  Korschgen, C. E., K. P. Kenow, A. Gendron-Fitzpatrick, W. L. Green, and F. J. Dein. 1996. Implanting intra-abdominal radiotransmitters with external whip antennas in ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management. 60:132–137.

3.  Mills KM, Gaydos JK, Vilchis LI, Fiorello C, Whitmer E, Ziccardi MD, De La Cruz S, and Mulcahy D. In Preparation. Field testing a modified surgical technique for implanting intracoelomic satellite transmitters with percutaneous antennae to assess post-release survival and movement of Western Grebes.

  

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Joseph K. Gaydos
The SeaDoc Society
UC Davis Wildlife Health Center - Orcas Island Office
Eastsound, WA, USA


MAIN : Avian Health & Medicine : Transmitter Implantation
Powered By VIN
SAID=27