Immunohistochemistry as a Tool for the Differentiation of Marine Mammal Morbilliviruses
J.B. Stanton1; S. Poet1; C.C. Brown1; J.T. Saliki2; S. Frasca, Jr.3; T.P. Lipscomb4; S. Kennedy5; P.J. Duignan6; P-Y Daoust7; T. Jauniaux8
Abstract
In recent decades, morbilliviruses have been responsible for major
epizootics among marine mammals. Histopathology can provide a simple means for the recognition
of disease due to morbilliviruses. However, determination of the exact virus is often
problematic. This is caused by: (1) the often autolyzed state of the carcasses making virus
isolation difficult, (2) the similarity of the histopathologic lesions and (3) the overlapping
host ranges of these viruses. The use of specific immunohistochemical tests for the diagnosis of
marine mammal morbilliviruses was tested as a means to differentiate these viruses. Four
monoclonal antibodies made against phocine distemper virus (PDV) and three monoclonal antibodies
made against cetacean morbillivirus (CMV) were tested on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded
tissues from confirmed cases of PDV, CMV, and canine distemper virus (CDV). All four anti-PDV
antibodies stained both PDV and CDV but not CMV. Of the three anti-CMV antibodies, two were
positive for CMV and negative for CDV and PDV. One anti-CMV antibody was positive for CMV and
CDV, but was negative for PDV. Application of these antibodies to histopathologic samples having
lesions consistent with morbillivirus infection provide a diagnostic means for distinguishing
between infection of PDV (or CDV) and CMV.