Quality assessment and characterization of unregulated antiviral drugs for feline infectious peritonitis: implications for treatment, safety, and efficacy.

Am J Vet Res. March 2024;85(3):1 - 9.

Aidan J Mulligan¹, Megan E Browning²

¹ Juan Diego Catholic High School, Draper, UT.; ² Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:Feline infectious peritonitis is fatal, and due to lack of approved treatments, unregulated antiviral drugs are used to treat this disease. This study set out to determine the purity of various batches of these drugs from several companies, characterize them, and note any impurities or other unusual characteristics. We also developed a method to qualitatively assess the primary components before administration.

SAMPLES:We tested 30 vials from 17 brands of GS-441524 and 5 vials from 1 brand of GC376. We compared the GS-441524 to a control standard from Ambeed and the GC376 to a standard from Cayman Chemical.

METHODS:We recorded physical appearance, pH, absorbance, HPLC retention times, and thin-layer chromatography retention factors for all of the samples. Some samples were used for nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometric analysis.

RESULTS:Some of the GS-441524 vials were 10% to 25% more concentrated than advertised, but most of the GS-441524 samples tested were similar in purity and composition, both between batches and between brands. We also tested 5 vials of GC376 and found that 1 of the 5 vials contained GS-441524 rather than GC376 and the other 4 vials contained molnupiravir.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:While all of the GS-441524 vials contained GS-441524, none of the GC376 vials tested contained GC376. GC376 is used in cats that are unresponsive to GS-441524, and use of the wrong antiviral can cause serious side effects. We provide suggested methods for distinguishing one drug from the other in new batches.

Keywords

FIP; GC376; GS-441524; coronavirus; molnupiravir;

Article Tools:

Medline

Email to me

Archives Highlights:

Performing an Avian Physical Examination in Practice
As with mammalian physical examinations, it is important to develop a consistent order for the avian examination to thoroughly evaluate each body system. Some components of the physical examination differ between avian species. For example, cloacal palpation is performed in chickens, but not in parrots.

Oral Flea Preventive to Control Rickettsia typhi-Infected Fleas on Reservoir Opossums, Galveston, Texas, USA, 2023-2024.
Spinosad killed 98% of fleas infesting opossums.

Owner survey suggests cats may be undertreated for pain compared to dogs after an elective ovariohysterectomy or orchiectomy.
Analgesics were prescribed for 19 of 162 (12%) pets: 14 of 88 (16%) dogs and 5 of 74 (6.7%) cats. There was no difference in the prescription of analgesics between dogs and cats after ovariohysterectomy or orchiectomy. 15 of 19 owners reported their compliance in administering analgesics at 78.9%. Owners' subjective assessments showed that 24 of 86 (28%) dogs and 12 of 68 (17%) cats appeared painful at home.

Feline blood donation: Description and adverse reactions from 29 201 donation events between 2019 and 2023.
Adverse reactions were uncommon (0.29%, 2.88/1000 donor events) and most commonly were cardiorespiratory (0.08%, 0.75/1000 donor events) or behavioral (0.06%, 0.62/1000 donor events). The only risk factor significantly associated with adverse reactions was conscious donation, with conscious donors 4.4 times more likely to have an adverse reaction.

Choose Your Own Adventure: Using Twine for Gamified Interactive Learning in Veterinary Anaesthesia.
Five interactive clinical cases were developed using Twine, simulating realistic anaesthesia scenarios with decision points and gamified elements, such as scoring systems and resource management. Feedback was highly positive; 90.8% found it effective for training, and 97.0% agreed it improved knowledge. User-friendliness was rated as "easy" or "very easy" by 94.6%. Regarding overall satisfaction, 96.7% of students described the workshop as "good" or "excellent".